Skip to main content
 

capstone wiki title

Kenneth C Ngwu Jr., SPT

INTRODUCTION

As a former collegiate athlete, I’ve had the pleasure of utilizing kettlebells for improvement of sports performance. I have also utilized them during many CrossFit workouts for maintenance of my overall health and fitness. My experience with kettlebells and observation of their use in PT practice at a previous rotation led to the development of my PICO question: For individuals participating in a highly active occupation, is a LE rehabilitation program with kettlebell training more effective than a traditional LE rehabilitation program without kettlebell training for resumption of prior level of activity? I was able to retrieve plenty of existing evidence regarding kettlebells as an exercise modality in clinical practice. After reviewing the evidence for critical analysis, I learned that kettlebells can serve as an effective adjunct to the rehabilitation of higher level functioning individuals with a lower body dysfunction. Later, I also explored evidence behind the utility of other exercise modalities such as the Total Gym, TRX Suspension System, and Swiss balls in clinical practice.

OVERVIEW

The selection of these modalities was mostly inspired from my previous clinical rotation with Advanced Physical Therapy Solutions (APTS) in Fayetteville, NC. At APTS, I was able to instruct and assist patients in utilizing these exercise modalities for the performance of therapeutic exercise. However, I remember initially not being aware of how some of the exercise modalities could be utilized for patient care. This made the process of selecting the appropriate therapeutic exercise and its associated modality a significant challenge especially for lower level functioning patients. Luckily, the mentorship provided by my CI and the clinical staff at APTS enabled me to overcome this challenge. This experience and recent knowledge of clinical evidence regarding each exercise modality inspired me to create an educational component for the Exercise Prescription class. The purpose of this component was to educate students about the existing clinical evidence and potential utility of kettlebells, Swiss Balls, TRX Suspension System, and the Total Gym as exercise modalities in the rehabilitation of individuals with a lower body dysfunction.

Below, I have briefly described each of the four exercise modalities and their related clinical evidence, which is further described in my CAPSTONE project.

  • Swiss Ball (SB) exercises are often utilized in clinical practice as effective methods of lumbar stabilization and core strengthening. Existing evidence has supported its implementation as components into the POC for many patient populations. Many studies have already demonstrated the clinical efficacy of SB exercises for LBP patient populations. Other studies have also demonstrated the therapeutic effects of Swiss ball exercises for improvement of functional mobility and balance.
  • TRX Suspension Training is an exercise modality with a single anchor system that supports or loads movements through multiple planes to enable a unique form of functional training.1 This system allows for a wide range of bodyweight exercises to be appropriately modified and performed for the purposes of rehabilitation.1 Lately, TRX has become increasingly utilized in clinical practice for closed chain exercise in lower extremity rehabilitation to allow progression from partial to full weight-bearing exercise.1 Physical therapists have considered this exercise modality as a functional training tool that facilitates proprioceptive core stabilization and enhancement for a variety of patient populations.1 However, there are only two published clinical studies related to the use of TRX for health and wellness efforts.
  • The Total Gym is one of the more popular exercise modalities for functional and bodyweight training in conditioning and rehabilitation.This exercise modality has been heavily recognized for allowing early partial weight bearing and closed kinetic chain rehabilitation of lower extremity dysfunction in patients receiving physical therapy care.The Total Gym is considered one of the most effective and safe tools for functional rehabilitation that allows patients to progress safely with measurable results.Ironically, the Total Gym has only one study related to its use in clinical practice.
  • Kettlebells are cast iron weights resembling a cannonball-shaped orb with a handle attached to it.3This design creates an offset center of gravity that allows for its center of mass to extend beyond the gripping hand to facilitate full-body ballistic movements in kettlebell training.Strength and conditioning professionals have utilized kettlebell training exercises to improve muscular strength, endurance, power, and cardiorespiratory fitness.3,4It has also been utilized in many clinical studies for lower extremity rehabilitation, LBP prevention and promotion of health and wellness.

Collectively, each of these four exercise modalities are capable of facilitating many dynamic body movements in therapeutic exercise necessary for functional rehabilitation. These capabilities can often be limited by a physical therapist’s creativity and their knowledge of biomechanics. They can also be significantly limited by a physical therapist’s unawareness of their potential utility in clinical practice. This can be prevented by provision of educational components with learning objectives similar to my CAPSTONE presentation, which are listed below:

  • The learner will demonstrate awareness of existing clinical evidence regarding each of the therapeutic exercise modalities.
  • The learner will be able to consider the age, lifestyle, and current condition of a patient when identifying what exercise modality is appropriate and safe in their plan of care.
  • The learner will become familiar with common low level exercises that can be implemented with use of each of the four exercise modalities.
  • The learner will become aware of how certain exercise modalities can facilitate efforts for the conditioning phase of rehabilitation and health and wellness.

PRODUCTS

The purpose of my CAPSTONE was facilitated by illustrating the use of each of the 4 exercise modalities in video clips embedded throughout my PowerPoint presentation, which you can download here. I highlighted some of the evidence behind each of the modalities, which are further described in my evidence table that you can download here.

I was able to present my CAPSTONE earlier this month to an audience of 30 first-year students in their Exercise Prescription class, as well as 2 faculty members. The presentation lead to some good class discussion as students were asked to determine how they could modify an illustrated exercise to be less challenging or more challenging according to a patient’s needs. They discussed how to determine which exercise and its associated modality were the most appropriate for each of the 4 mock patient scenarios provided at the conclusion of the presentation.

I also developed an extensive literature review to critique and analyze existing evidence related to the clinical efficacy of each of the four exercise modalities. You can download my literature review here.

EVALUATION

I administered a pretest and post-test to 30 first year students in attendance  for my presentation. The test results demonstrated significant improvements in the students’ knowledge and awareness of each of the four exercise modalities in clinical practice. I also provided a web survey to the two faculty members in attendance to retrieve feedback on my presentation and its content. You can download the feedback and test results here to view them.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to give a special thanks to my committee members Amy Cecchini for her valued input from a clinical perspective and Mike Lewek for his guidance in developing my presentation. I would also like to thank Mike Gross, Karen McCullough, my mother and Mijo Cotic for their advisement and encouragement throughout the development of my CAPSTONE research and presentation. Lastly, I would like to say THANK YOU for visiting my CAPSTONE WikiSite. I would love to hear any of your comments or questions, which you can leave below or email to me at kenneth_ngwu@med.unc.edu.

 

REFERENCES

1.           Bettendorf B. TRX ® Suspension Training ® Bodyweight Exercise: Scientific Foundations and Practical Applications. San Francisco, CA; 2010:1–15.

2.           Our Story | Total Gym Physical Therapy. Available at: http://www.totalgymphysicaltherapy.com/our-team/. Accessed April 1, 2014.

3.           Lake JP, Lauder MA. Mechanical demands of kettlebell swing exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(12):3209–16. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182474280.

4.           Otto WH, Coburn JW, Brown LE, Spiering BA. Effects of weightlifting vs. kettlebell training on vertical jump, strength, and body composition. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(5):1199–202. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f233e.

 

6 Responses to “Therapeutic Exercise Modalities in Clinical Practice for LE Rehabilitation”

  1. Kenneth Ngwu

    Jason,

    I’m glad that you found my CAPSTONE to be very informative and that it may be a future resource for you in your practice as a PT. You asked some good questions, which I answered below:

    Do you have any plans to continue collecting new articles pertaining to these modalities as they are published, or do you think you will investigate the use of kettebells?
    At the moment, I still have an ongoing search query set up with the PubMed and ScienceDirect online libraries for each of the modalities. This set up allows me to be notified via email about the future release of any article related to the clinical evidence behind each of the 4 modalities. Following my presentation, I’ve received two more email notifications about kettlebells, but no more for the other three modalities. Nonetheless, I believe their utility in clinical practice is still appropriate when you simply consider the involved biomechanics.

    Did you have the DPT1’s split up in to groups to discuss these scenarios?
    No, but I believe the method you’re suggesting for more class discussion would have been appropriate if more class time was permitted. Luckily, class discussion occurred throughout the presentation as I asked students how they felt each illustrated exercise could be modified for a lower- and higher- level functioning patient. I believe their thought process during this class discussion can be later applied by students in their future clinical rotations as they work with patients who will likely need such modifications. Also, the class discussion with the patient case scenarios was more intended to serve as wrap up of the information presented for each of the 4 modalities. I believe this contributed to the noted improvements of the students’ knowledge and awareness of each of the four exercise modalities.

    Do you plan to use this presentation at your last clinical rotation, or elsewhere?
    At the moment, I do not have any set plans to do so. However, I believe my final capstone products may be useful for a rehab manager or director interested in the purchase of exercise modalities for their facility. So, I may use my presentation for an in-service at an upcoming clinical rotation in the OP orthopedic setting.

    -Kenneth

    Reply
  2. Kenneth Ngwu

    Mijo,

    Thank you for your warm compliments regarding my final capstone materials. Our capstone projects are definitely similar in the aspect of functional intervention strategies necessary for exercise prescription. Your thoughts on kettlebell training and its implications related to “whole body” functional movements are pretty much dead on! It’s good to hear that you will be able to use my final capstone materials as a reference in your future work as a PT. I also plan on doing the same with your own final capstone materials, which are pretty much innovative, resourceful, and highly relevant to clinical practice.

    -Kenneth

    Reply
  3. Kenneth Ngwu

    Mike,

    Thank you again for allowing me to present to the class. In the future, I believe that I will definitely entertain any opportunity to contribute to the clinical research of any of these modalities. Until then, I also hope that the products of my CAPSTONE can help established PT’s consider other effective methods of therapeutic exercise necessary for sports performance and LE rehabilitation.

    -Kenneth

    Reply
  4. Jason Albright

    Kenneth,

    I found your capstone to be very informative, and it made me want to have had the opportunity to hear you present it. In my clinical experience I have used both the swiss ball, and total gym. However, I have not used them to the extent you have educated us on. I have yet to come across the kettebell and TRX suspension training in a clinical setting. After looking through your evidence and powerpoint, I think I will utilize these modalities in the progression of patient’s exercise programs.

    I like the way you structured your evidence table, by coloring coding the different modalities. I feel that there will continue to be more research coming out on these modalities for quite some time, and I feel that you were able to capture the relevant articles out there now. Do you have any plans to continue collecting new articles pertaining to these modalities as they are published, or do you think you will investigate the use of kettebells?

    You mentioned in your evaluation portion that you felt the need to offer more background and discussion at the beginning of the presentation. I would say that any time you offer more discussion it facilitates learning and applying what you are teaching. Thus, I would agree that you should offer more discussion opportunities. However, I would assume that the case scenarios you used towards the end of your presentation provided a good deal of discussion. Did you have the DPT1’s split up in to groups to discuss these scenarios? If so, I would think they should have taken more away from your presentation, than if you hadn’t. Judging from the pie charts you provided, it looks like there was a big change in how comfortable they felt with these modalities post presentation. By the way, great job at creating all the graphs and charts.

    Overall, great job on the presentation. Do you plan to use this presentation at your last clinical rotation, or elsewhere?

    Jason

    Reply
  5. Tomislav Cotic

    Kenneth,
    I want to start off by saying you did such a nice job with your final capstone materials. I remember telling you back during the EBP II course in the fall that I was intrigued by your idea, and you did not disappoint at all. I was lucky enough to have the opportunity as well as the pleasure to hear you present your project to me, first hand, and I can honestly say that I thoroughly enjoyed it. In essence, I believe both of our capstone projects demonstrate one main similarity: an emphasis of functional intervention strategies that engage the entire body. During my time here at UNC, I’ve been trying to figure out how I want to approach patient care and intervention strategies. I know we have talked about this in person, but my philosophy regarding exercise prescription continues to be a progression to synergistic, whole body movements that target the entire body. That’s how the body works in ‘real life’ and that’s what clinicians need to strive for when progressing their patients back to functionality.

    This is what intrigued me about your PICO question initially, even back in the fall. Specifically related to kettle bell training, this exercise modality allows for ‘whole body’ movements that build strength and endurance in the legs, but also in the core, arms and shoulders, and also can increase grip strength. They basically simulate real world, functional activities and allow an individual to mimic what they do in real life: synergistic activation of the entire body during movement.

    I have yet to use kettle bells with my patients in the clinic, but I have had the chance to use TRX suspension training and the Swiss ball. Your presentation, and the rest of your final materials have provided me with numerous intervention ideas to not only advance exercises but also modify exercises for lower level patients. I know that I will use your capstone materials as a reference when I am making decisions about exercise interventions for patients during my final clinical and when I begin my PT career.

    Again, great work carrying out this capstone process. I want to see you adding to the evidence regarding these modalities in the future!
    -Mijo

    Reply
  6. Michael Lewek

    Kenneth
    You did a nice job putting this all together. Thank you for coming in and presenting to our class. Your pre- post-test suggests that they learned something from it. Hopefully they will keep the presentation and be able to reference it when they are making decisions about exercise interventions for patients on their clinicals.
    I know that you were most interested in the evidence behind use of kettlebells. While there appears to be some, I hope that you will consider the opportunity to engage in your own clinical research in the future to add to the body of knowledge that exists (whether it is shown to be beneficial or not).
    Nice work.
    Mike

    Reply

Leave a Reply